Analysis of the Effectiveness of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: A Case Study of PT. Bank Muamalat Indoneisa and PT. General Takaful Economy

Mega Oktaviany, Ade Rangga Putra Ashary, Nadhirah Nordin

Abstract


This paper explains how arbitration functions in the Indonesian legal system. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a legal remedy that can be made by law to reach a final decision based on the principle of final and binding. This study aims to study the way sharia arbitration bodies handle economic disputes. The research method used is juridical-normative, using descriptive qualitative analysis. The results showed that, as an extra-judicial institution governed by international law that has been ratified by the Indonesian government, arbitration helps complement the Indonesian judicial system. And the absence of a legal remedy for a final award in accordance with the principles of final and binding And the absence of legal remedies for a final decision in accordance with the principle of finality and binding is one of the advantages of settlement through arbitration compared to the court, In conclusion arbitration is more effective in resolving sharia insurance disputes based on the principle of simple, fast, and cheap justice according to the mandate of the Law.


Keywords


Dispute Solution; Shariah Economy; Basyarnas.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andriansyah, Y. (2023). Analysis of Fatwas by the National Sharia Board-Indonesian Council of Ulama on the Stock Market. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 22(2), 525–552. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol22.iss2.art9.

Ansori, Manual, U., Brämswig, K., Ploner, F., Martel, A., Bauernhofer, T., Hilbe, W., Kühr, T., Leitgeb, C., Mlineritsch, B., Petzer, A., Seebacher, V., Stöger, H., Girschikofsky, M., Hochreiner, G., Ressler, S., Romeder, F., Wöll, E., Brodowicz, T., Baker, D. (2022). Analisis Problematika Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah Sektor Kuliner Terhadap Kewajiban Pendaftaran Sertifikasi Halal Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) (Studi Kasus Pada UMKM Sektor Kuliner di Kec. Tanjung Karang Pusat). Science, 7(1), 1–8. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00232-014-9701-9%0Ahttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00232-014-9700-x%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2008.11.017%0Ahttp://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1090780708003674%0Ahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1191.

Barabas, C., Doyle, C., Rubinovitz, J. B., & Dinakar, K. (2020). Studying up: Reorienting the study of algorithmic fairness around issues of power. FAT* 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372859.

Dewi, I. M. W. C. S. M. L. (2021). Non Litigation Dispute Resolution in Settlement of Civil Disputes. Legal Brief, 10(2), 215.

Fitriyah, N., & Soviana, R. (2021). Efektivitas Peran Arbitrase Syariah Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 5(02), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.26618/j-hes.v5i02.5447

Hanifah, I. (2024). Non-Litigation Dispute Resolution Based on Labor Law in Indonesia. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v9i1.18058.

Hapsari, D. R. I., Ilmiawan, A. A. S., & Samira, E. (2022). Non-litigation as An Environmental Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 2(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i1.20756.

Hasan, H. (2022). Penerapan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Dalam Persektif Hukum Di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Kasasi Nomor : 219B/Pdt.Sus.Artb/2016). Dharmasisya: Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(December), 31. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisyaAvailableat:https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss1/31.

Lubis, R. H., & Aprilia, V. (2023). Shulhu Concept Analysis for Appropriate Product Dispute Resolution in Sharia Financing. JIOSE: Journal of Indonesian Sharia Economics, 2(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.35878/jiose.v2i2.897.

Maulana, A. R., & Mariani. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Pada Arbitrase. BANJARESE: Journal Of International Multidisiplinary Research, 1(1), 84–93. https://repo.iainbatusangkar.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/18585.

Murali, J., & Kumar, D. V. S. (2020). Litigation in Construction Contracts: Literature Review. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(1), 3119001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000342.

Nabilah, R., Maharani, A. S., & Tarina, D. D. Y. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Melalui Lembaga Litigasi Dan Non Litigasi (Arbitrase). Tesis, December, 1–112.

Shobroni, S. (2024). IRDH International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities The Position of The National Sharia Council ’ s Fatwas in. 1(1), 1–6.

Star, S., & Kelly, S. (2021). A level playing field in anti-doping disputes? The need to scrutinize procedural fairness at first instance hearings. International Sports Law Journal, 21(1–2), 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-020-00176-6.

Sukardi, M. S., & Ulya, N. H. (2022). Usaha Sarang Burung Walet Di Desa Sepakat Baru Perspektif Al-Shulhu. Journal of Shariah Economic Law Faculty of Shariah IAIN Pontianak, 2(1), 201–208.

Syarifuddin, A. (2022). Menggali Hukum Progresif Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 93/Puu-X/2012 Atas Pengujian Pasal 55 Ayat (2) Dan (3) Undang-Undang No. 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah. 14(2), 2686–5262.

Vero, A. C. (2022). Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Solusi Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Luar Pegadilan Vero Arivani Caniago Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(20), 304–313.

Watti, P. K., Taroreh, R. A., & Mamangkey, R. M. (2023). Peranan Pengadilan Indonesia Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Proses Arbitrase. Teknik Pengumpulan Data Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Pada Metode Penelitian, 2(6), 784–808.

Yuniardi, S. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah Pasca Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 93/PUU-X/2012 dihubungkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum (Studi Kasus Putusan No.28/PDT.G/2018PT.BDG). Nurani Hukum, 2(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v2i2.8656.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.

Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30984/tjebi.v9i1.2903

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 73 times
PDF - 52 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Tasharruf: Journal Economics and Business of Islam is indexed by:

JURISMA : Jurnal Riset Bisnis & Manajemen
       



       

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

________________________________________________________
Tasharruf: Journal Economics and Bussiness of Islam is published by Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Manado

Jl. Dr. S. H. Sarundajang Kawasan Ring Road I Malendeng Manado, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia 95128
Email: [email protected]

ISSN Print: 2528-0317 ISSN Online: 2528-0325