Ancestral Religions and The Grand Narrative of Official Religions in Indonesia: A Postmodernist Analysis

Eka Yuliana Rahman, Nur Allan Lasido, Hanief Syawie

Abstract


This research presents an updated analysis of the dynamics of ancestral religion in Indonesia using a postmodernist approach. This research aims to review how ancestral religions are understood within the grand narrative of official religions and the implications for the division of rights and treatment of citizens based on religious choices, which often become political issues. Through a qualitative approach and analysis of postmodernism popularised by Lyotard and Foucault, this research dismantles the single narrative of official religions. The method used is critical discourse analysis. The main findings of this research show that ancestral religions in Indonesia face pressure from the grand narratives of official religions. Ancestral religions are often positioned as part of problematic activities that result in not getting equal recognition with official religions. On the other hand, the grand narrative of official religion impacts the meaning and interpretation of ancestral religions that are still considered sinful, and there are still restrictions on their religious practices. The implications of the findings of this research point to the political and social aspects of categorising ancestral religions as "other" or "profane" and the impact on their treatment and rights in society. Although in November 2017, the Constitutional Court (MK) granted a judicial review of some articles in the Population and Administration Law, acts of persecution still occur against them.

Keywords


Ancestral Religions; Grand Narratives; Official Religions of Indonesia.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdillah, A. N., & Izah, S. A. (2022). Dinamika Hubungan Antara Agama Lokal, Agama Resmi, dan Negara. Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 7(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.14421/mjsi.71.2966

Allen, G. (2022). Intertextuality (3rd Editio). Routledge.

Arumningtyas, R., Unde, A. A., & Fatimah, J. M. (2023). Komunikasi Simbolik Ritual Andingingi: Pesan Masyarakat Adat Ammatoa Kajang Tentang Pentingnya Menjaga Hutan. Perspektif Komunikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Politik Dan Komunikasi Bisnis, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24853/pk.7.1.19-32

Berger, A. A. (2022). Everyday Life in the Postmodern World. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07926-9

Budijanto, O. W. (2016). Penghormatan Hak Asasi Manusia Bagi Penghayat Kepercayaan Di Kota Bandung. Jurnal HAM, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2016.7.35-44

Campbell, M. (2018). Postmodernism and Educational Research. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(7), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.67006

Caputo, J. (2019). On Religion (2nd Editio). Routledge.

Cox, H. (1984). Religion in the secular city: Toward a postmodern theology. Simon and Schuster.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Cusack, C. M. (2016). Archaeology and the World Religions Paradigm: The European Neolithic, religion and cultural imperialism. In After World Religions (pp. 153–167). Routledge.

Dybicz, P., & Hall, J. C. (2021). An introduction to the postmodern paradigm via contrast to the modern paradigm: Relevance for direct social work practice. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100206

Eliade, M. (1959). The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. In A Harvest Book. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Foucault. (1988). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Pantheon Books.

Fuad, Z. (2007). Religious Pluralism in Indonesia: Muslim-Christian Discourse. Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky.

Greetz, C. (1973). Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. The Interpretation of Cultures. In Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. Basic Books.

Harvey, G. (2000). Indigenous religions: A companion. A&C Black.

Hasse, J. (2011). Diskriminasi Negara Terhadap Agama di Indonesia, Studi atas Persoalan Posisi Hukum Towani Tolotang Pasca Pengakuan Agama Resmi. Jurnal Kawistara, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.3918

Hefner, R. W. (2021). Islam and institutional religious freedom in Indonesia. Religions, 12(6), 415.

Hijjang, P., Basir, M., & Ismail, A. (2019). Indigenous people’s environmental conservation system: case study of Kajang society, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343(1), 12090.

Ionescu, V. (2019). Jean-François Lyotard. The European Legacy, 24(5), 574–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2018.1559553

Jameson, F. (2016). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. In Postmodernism (pp. 62–92). Routledge.

Jassim, A. K., & Rashid, L. A. (2022). Postmodernist Speculation of Religion and History. مجلة آداب الفراهيدي, 14(50), 564–573. https://doi.org/10.51990/jaa.14.50.1.27

Kabir, G. M. (2020). Paradigma Agama Leluhur. CRCS UGM. https://crcs.ugm.ac.id/Paradigma-Agama-Leluhur/

Karundeng, R. (2019). Ziarah 3 Januari dan Distorsi Makna Upacara Tumo’tol. Kelung.Id. https://kelung.id/ziarah-3-januari-dan-distorsi-makna-upacara-tumotol/

Keegan, B. (2023). Indigenous Religious Traditions. Indigenous Religious Traditions, 1(2), 189–218. https://doi.org/10.1558/irt.26734

Kholiludin, T. (2009). Kuasa negara atas agama: politik pengakuan, diskursus" agama resmi", dan diskriminasi hak sipil. RaSAIL Media Group.

Lyotard, F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (1st Editio). University Of Minnesota Press.

Ma’arif, S. (2017). Pasang surut rekognisi agama leluhur dalam politik agama di Indonesia. CRCS UGM Yogyakarta.

McDaniel, J. (2015). Indonesia, modernity and some problems of religious adaptation. Wacana, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v15i2.406

Mubarok, H. (2019). History of Advocacy of Religious Pluralism: Case Study of Ancestral Religion Advocacy in Indonesia. Dialog, 42(2), 134–145.

Mulder, N., & Nugroho, A. A. (1984). Kebatinan dan hidup sehari-hari orang Jawa: kelangsungan dan perubahan kulturil. Gramedia.

Nusrat, M. (2018). Kepercayaan Masyarakat Adat Masih Dipermasalahkan. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/baca/utama/2018/03/17/kepercayaan-masyarakat-adat-masih-dipermasalahkan

Oviedo, L., & Szocik, K. (2020). Religious—And Other Beliefs: How Much Specificity? SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401989884. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019898849

Philpott, D. (2019). Religious freedom in Islam: the fate of a universal human right in the Muslim world today. Oxford University Press.

Picard, M. (2017). Introduction: Local Traditions and World Religions. Encountering ‘Religion’ in Southeast Asia and Melanesia. In The Appropriation of Religion in Southeast Asia and Beyond (pp. 1–38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56230-8_1

Pinontoan, D. H. R. (2019). Agama (Tua) Minahasa dalam Mitos, Ritus dan Kultus. In Agama Dan Kepercayaan Nusantara. Lembaga Studi Sosial dan Agama (eLSA) Press.

Przeworski, A., & Maravall, J. M. (2003). Democracy and the Rule of Law (Vol. 5). Cambridge University Press.

Rabinow, P. (2020). The Foucault Reader. Penguin Modern Classics.

Reuter, T. (2015). Is Ancestor veneration the most universal of all world religions? A critique of modernist cosmological bias. Wacana, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v15i2.402

Riyanto, A. (2020). Asal Usul “Liyan.” In Raharso (Ed.), Mengabdi Tuhan dan Mencintai Liyan: Penghayatan agama di ruang publik dan plural. Widya Sasana.

Sari, I. P. (2021). Discrimination against belief Towani Tolotang society in the implementation of constitutional law on human rights. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 3(1), 1–14.

SETARA Institute. (2022). Perusakan Wale Paliusan Milik Penghayat Laroma Oleh Oknum Rohaniawan Ungkap Permasalahan Serius Stigma Terhadap Penghaya. SETARA. https://setara-institute.org/perusakan-wale-paliusan-milik-penghayat-laroma-oleh-oknum-rohaniawan-ungkap-permasalahan-serius-stigma-terhadap-penghayat/

Sezgin, Y., & Künkler, M. (2014). Regulation of “Religion” and the “Religious”: The Politics of Judicialization and Bureaucratization in India and Indonesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 56(2), 448–478. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417514000103

Shah, M. H. (2022). Religion and Postmodernism. Journal of KATHA, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22452/KATHA.vol18no1.1

Silverman, D. (2017). How was it for you? The Interview Society and the irresistible rise of the (poorly analyzed) interview. Qualitative Research, 17(2), 144–158.

Silvia. (2023). Setara: Pelanggaran Kebebasan Beragama 2022 Meningkat Dibanding Tahun Lalu. DetikNews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6544319/setara-pelanggaran-kebebasan-beragama-2022-meningkat-dibanding-tahun-lalu

Smith, J. Z. (2004). Relating religion: Essays in the study of religion. University of Chicago Press.

Wafi, R. N. (2020). Di Balik Imaji Klenik dan Sesat dari Penghayat Kepercayaan. Remotivi. https://www.remotivi.or.id/headline/konsep-dan-isu/621

Waitkus, A. (2019). Postmodern Theology: an Open Canon. CLA Journal, 7(2019), 131–140.

Widayani. (2018). Religi dan Tradisi: Keberlanjutan Agama Leluhur di Masyarakat Adat. Pustaka Abadi.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30984/pp.v28i1.3115

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 94 times
PDF - 36 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Potret Pemikiran

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statistic Journal Potret

Rumah Jurnal Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado

Jl. Dr. S.H. Sarundajang, Kawasan Ringroad I, Malendeng Manado Kode Pos 95128, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia.

Creative Commons License

All publication by  Potret Pemikiran are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Potret Pemikiran, ISSN 1693-1874 (Print), ISSN 2528-0376 (Online)