Navigating Custody: The Impact of Religious Court Judges on Interfaith Family Dynamics

Salma Mursyid, Naskur Bilalu, Syahrul Mubarak Subeitan

Abstract


This study examines the critical role of Religious Court judges in deciding child custody in families with parents of different religions in Indonesia. Religious Court judges face unique challenges in balancing Islamic legal principles with children's best interests in a complex and diverse social context. This study aims to identify factors that affect judges' decisions, including legal foundations, moral considerations, and social impacts. Using a qualitative approach, data were obtained through in-depth interviews with judges, case analysis, and literature reviews. The study results show that judges consider not only formal law but also social values and the interests of children. Factors such as the child's psychological condition, emotional stability, and a healthy growth and development environment are the primary considerations in decision-making. In addition, the study found that the diversity of interpretations of Islamic law among judges influenced their final decisions. This study found that Religious Court judges consider not only formal law but also social values and the best interests of children in making decisions on child custody in families of different religions. In addition, the diversity of interpretations of Islamic law among judges also influences the final decision, with factors such as the child's psychological condition and emotional stability being the primary considerations.


Keywords


Religious Court Judge; Child Custody; Interfaith Family.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badriyah, S. M. (2022). Sistem penemuan hukum dalam masyarakat prismatik. Sinar Grafika.

Baude, W., & Sachs, S. E. (2016). The law of interpretation. Harv. L. Rev., 130, 1079.

Bilalu, N., Jamal, R., Harun, N., & Subeitan, S. M. (2022). Compilation of Islamic Law as Judge’s Consideration at a Religious Court in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 6(2), 1–23. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/article/view/12441/7391

Breen, C. (2021). The standard of the best interests of the child: A western tradition in international and comparative law (Vol. 72). Brill.

Bruch, E., & Feinberg, F. (2017). Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053622

Budianto, A. (2020). Legal research methodology reposition in research on social science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9(1), 1339–1346.

Djawas, M., Hasballah, K., Devy, S., Kadir, M. A., & Abda, Y. (2022). The Construction of Islamic Inheritance Law: A Comparative Study of the Islamic Jurisprudence and the Compilation of Islamic Law. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 21(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i2.7495

Dobinson, I., & Johns, F. (2017). Legal research as qualitative research. Research Methods for Law, 18–47.

Dupret, B., Belkadi, A., Lindbekk, M., & Yakin, A. U. (2023). Paternal Filiation in Muslim-Majority Environments: A Comparative Look at the Interpretive Practice of Positive Islamic Law in Indonesia, Egypt, and Morocco. Journal of Law, Religion and State, 10(2–3), 167–217. https://doi.org/10.1163/22124810-20230002

Efendi, J. (2018). Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim. Prenada Media.

Hasballah, K., Darna, A., Said, W., Akbar, H., Makinara, I. K., & Fauzan, F. (2021). Identifying ’Illat through Munasabah in Islamic Law: A Perspective of Imam Al-Ghazali. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 5(2), 598–618.

Hasballah, K., Mubarrak, D., & Rassanjani, S. (2023). Disparity in judge decisions in resolving RAD inheritance disputes: case study at the Sharia Court in Banda Aceh City. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 6(2), 249–261.

Kasim, N. M., & Semiaji, T. (2022). Divorce Cases in Members of Indonesian Police Force: A Positive Law Perspective. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v20i1.1793

Lefaan, V. B. B., & Suryana, Y. (2018). Tinjauan Psikologi Hukum Dalam Perlindungan Anak. Deepublish.

Lindbekk, M. (2020). Implementing the Law of khul in Egypt: Tensions and Ambiguities in Muslim Family Law. Hawwa, 18(2–3), 265–294.

Litehua, A. (2020). Faktor-Faktor Cerai Gugat di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Madiun. IAIN Ponorogo.

Mursyid, S., Bilalu, N., & Subeitan, S. M. (2024). Between the Principles of Religion and Universal Justice: A Study of Judges’ Opinions in the Matter of Hadhanah for Parents of Different Religions. Proceeding Sharia International Conference, 10-12 Nov.

Nafisah, D., Nasrudin, N., Meidina, A. R., & Zain, M. F. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Islamic Family Law and Normative Laws: Examining the Causes of Divorce in Purwokerto, Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 8(2), 847–871.

Popa, M., & Andreescu, L. (2017). Legal provisions, courts, and the status of religious communities: a socio-legal analysis of inter-religious relations in Romania. Religion, State and Society, 45(3–4), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2017.1398942

Purwati, A. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum teori & praktek. Jakad Media Publishing.

Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J. (2017). Judging the judiciary by the numbers: Empirical research on judges. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 203–229.

Rohmawati, R., & Siddik, S. (2022). Legal Protection for Children Out of Wedlock: Ensuring the Best Interests of Children Through Judge Decisions. Al-’Adalah, 19(2), 315–338.

Rossouw, E., & Rothmann, S. (2020). Well-being of judges: A review of quantitative and qualitative studies. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 46. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v46i0.1759

Saputra, R. (2024). Hak Hadhanah (Analisa Perbandingan Putusan Mahkamah Syari’ah Sabang Dan Mahkamah Syari’ah Meulaboh. UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh.

Sudirman, L., Sunuwati, S., & Fasieh, M. A. (2023). Dwangsom: Investigate the Conceptual Basis of Religious Court on Child Custody Rulings. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 21(2), 173–185.

Tarantang, J., Khosyi’ah, S., & Saepullah, U. (2023). Filosofi ’Illat Hukum dan Maqashid Syariah dalam Perkawinan Beda Agama. Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Masyarakat, 19(1), 44–55.

Usman, M. (2015). Rekonstruksi Teori Hukum Islam; Membaca Ulang Pemikiran Reaktualisasi Hukum Islam Munawir Sjadzali. LKIS PELANGI AKSARA.

Welchman, L., Jouriou, Z., & Sharafeldin, M. (2023). Muslim Family Laws: Trajectories of Reform. Working Paper Series: School of Law, Gender and Media.

Yahya, A., & Zainuddin, M. (2021). The interpretation of the hadith on the characteristics of women and its implications for Islamic Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 5(1), 276–296.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30984/ajifl.v4i1.3039

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 470 times
PDF - 36 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Rumah Jurnal IAIN Manado

Jl. Dr. S.H. Sarundajang, Kawasan Ringroad I, Malendeng Manado Kode Pos 95128, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia.

 


All publication by Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law, ISSN 2809-2805 (Cetak), ISSN 2809-0756 (Online)