Power and Knowledge: Analysis of LGBTIQ Discourse in Sociology of Religion Based on Queer Theory
Abstract
This article intends to analyze the LGBTIQ discourse in sociology of religion based on queer theory. The conceptual framework in conceptualizing research results refers to the terminology of Michael Foucault's thoughts regarding the practice of discourse and power, and the queer theory approach. This research was conducted using a qualitative research method based on a critical discourse analysis approach. The critical discourse analysis approach is used in order to gain scientific knowledge and understanding regarding the reproduction of LGBTIQ discourse influenced by socio-religious values as part of sociology of religion studies. The findings of this study are that the power and knowledge gained from the terminology of Michael Foucault determined the paradox of discourse. Especially when it is associated with a socio-religious scientific background, it also creates contradictions that affect the socio-religious practices of the community in accepting the existence of LGBTIQ as an individual and community identity. However, as a sociology of religion researcher, we can use or integrate queer theory to produce inclusive knowledge because of the data collected based on LGBTIQ experiences, So that the scientific study in sociology of religion related to LGBTIQ research is more valid and reliable and does not tend to discriminate against their existence as part of humanity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allan, K. (2013). Contemporary social and sociological theory: Visualizing social worlds. Sage.
Beasley, C. (2005). Gender and sexuality: Critical theories, critical thinkers. Gender and Sexuality, 1–304.
Boellstorff, T. (2016). Against state straightism: Five principles for including LGBT Indonesians. E-International Relations, 21.
Filax, G., Sumara, D., Davis, B., & Shogan, D. (2004). Queer theory/lesbian and gay approaches. In Research Methods in the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Foucault, M. (2008). La Volonte de Savoir: Ingin Tahu Sejarah Seksualitas. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Halafoff, A., Shipley, H., Young, P. D., Singleton, A., Rasmussen, M. Lou, & Bouma, G. (2020). Complex, critical and caring: Young people’s diverse religious, spiritual and non-religious worldviews in Australia and Canada. Religions, 11(4), 166.
Haryatmoko. (2016). Membongkar Rezim Kepastian. Kanisius.
Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: An introduction. nyu Press.
Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. SAGE Publications.
Koeswinarno, K., & Mustolehudin, M. (2017). Islam, gay, and marginalization: a study on the religious behaviours of gays in Yogyakarta. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 7(1), 125–152.
McNally, S., & Grierson, J. (2014). Belonging, community and identity: Gay men in Indonesia. In Sex and Sexualities in Contemporary Indonesia (pp. 221–237). Routledge.
Polymenopoulou, E. (2018). LGBTI rights in Indonesia: A human rights perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 19(1), 27–44.
Rasmussen, M. Lou, Graefenstein, S., Singleton, A., Halafoff, A., & Bouma, G. (2020). Methodological challenges of designing a survey to capture young people’s (non-binary) affiliations in relationship to religion, sexuality and gender. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(6), 695–709.
Ridwan, R., & Wu, J. (2018). ’Being young and LGBT, what could be worse?’Analysis of youth LGBT activism in Indonesia: challenges and ways forward. Gender & Development, 26(1), 121–138.
Ritzer, G., & Smart, B. (2012). Handbook of Social Theory. Translated by Imam Malik. In Teori-Teori Sosial. Nusamedia.
Sedgwick, E. K. (2008). Epistemology of the Closet. Univ of California Press.
Setyono, V. S. (2023). The Rainbow Pilgrimage: Laporan Penelitian Orang Muda Ragam SOGIESC dan Ruang-Ruang Keimanan di Indonesia. YIFoS Indonesia.
Spencer, C. (1995). Homosexuality in History. Harcourt Brace and Company.
Thajib, F. (2018). The making and breaking of Indonesian Muslim queer safe spaces. Borderlands, 17(1), 1–24.
Toomistu, T. (2022). Thinking through the s (k) in: Indonesian waria and bodily negotiations of belonging across religious sensitivities. Indonesia and the Malay World, 50(146), 73–95.
Tumanan, P. K. M. (2020). The History of LGBQ discourses in indonesia. InterViews: An Interdisciplinary Journal in Social Sciences, 7(1), 73–80.
Wieringa, S. E. (2015). Discursive Contestations concerning intersex in Indonesia: stigma, rights and identities. In Sex and Sexualities in Contemporary Indonesia: Sexual Politics, Health, Diversity and Representations (pp. 169–182).
Wijaya Mulya, T. (2018). From divine instruction to human invention: The constitution of Indonesian Christian young people’s sexual subjectivities through the dominant discourse of sexual morality. Asian Studies Review, 42(1), 53–68.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30984/pp.v27i1.2526
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 242 timesPDF - 300 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Potret Pemikiran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Statistic Journal Potret
Rumah Jurnal Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado
Jl. Dr. S.H. Sarundajang, Kawasan Ringroad I, Malendeng Manado Kode Pos 95128, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia.
All publication by Potret Pemikiran are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Potret Pemikiran, ISSN 1693-1874 (Print), ISSN 2528-0376 (Online)