Enhancing Political Literacy Among Generation-Z Through Social Media: Evidence from Indonesia's Electoral Commission Instagram Account

Farissa Avikass Borneta, Iervin Gilang Kurnia, Ira Setyowati, Muh Sulfihidayatullah, Muzahid Akbar Hayat

Abstract


The digitalization of political communication has significantly transformed how citizens engage with political information, particularly among younger generations. Generation Z (Gen Z), born between 1997 and 2012, represents a cohort of digital natives with high technological literacy but relatively limited political awareness. In Indonesia, where Gen Z constitutes a substantial share of the electorate, electoral institutions face challenges in delivering effective political education through conventional channels. This study examines the effectiveness of political education content disseminated via the @KPU_KALSEL Instagram account in enhancing political literacy among Gen Z students. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, the study conducted semi-structured interviews with five undergraduate students from the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences at UNISKA (born in 2002), supported by content analysis and systematic observation carried out in November 2024. The findings indicate that Instagram-based political content contributes positively to increasing political awareness and understanding among Gen Z audiences. Factors influencing effectiveness include content accessibility, visual clarity, concise messaging, and topical relevance. Posts related to the Peaceful Campaign Declaration and information on the Quiet Period were perceived as particularly impactful. Participants demonstrated improved comprehension of electoral procedures, regulations, and democratic values. This study concludes that social media platforms, when strategically utilized, can serve as effective tools for political education and voter engagement among digitally native generations.

Keywords


Digital Democracy; Electoral Commission; Generation-Z; Political Education; Social Media.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfred, J. J. R., & Ping, W. S. (2022). The Relationship between the Perception of Social Media Credibility and Political Engagement in Social Media among Generation Z. Journal of Communication, Language and Culture, 2(2), 17 – 32. https://doi.org/10.33093/jclc.2022.2.2.2

Alruthaya, A., Nguyen, T.-T., & Lokuge, S. (2021). The Application of Digital Technology and the Learning Characteristics of Generation Z in Higher Education. ACIS 2021 - Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Proceedings.

Altaany, H. M., & Abdelbary, O. (2024). Civic Education and its Role in Social Stabilization: A Comprehensive Review. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 16(3), 1173 – 1184. https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.3.1173.1184

Ameen, N., & Anand, A. (2020). Generation Z in the United Arab Emirates: A Smart-Tech-Driven iGeneration. In The New Generation Z in Asia: Dynamics, Differences, Digitalization. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-220-820201018

Barker, K. (2020). Broadcasting new behavioral norms: Theories underlying the entertainment-education method. In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2014-3_67

Barley, E., & Lawson, V. (2016). Using health psychology to help patients: Theories of behaviour change. British Journal of Nursing, 25(16), 924 – 927. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2016.25.16.924

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Buford, M. V. (2022). Characteristics, Engagement, Learning, and Career Aspirations of Generation Z. In Mapping the Future of Undergraduate Career Education: Equitable Career Learning, Development, and Preparation in the New World of Work. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003213000-4

Bukido, R., Makka, M. M., Rivai, D. M., & Hasan, F. (2019). Ilmu dan Kepentingan Politik Tinjauan Hukum Islam. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 4(1), 1.

Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.

Chardonnens, S. (2025). Adapting educational practices for Generation Z: integrating metacognitive strategies and artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1504726

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Garnett, H. A. (2019). Evaluating electoral management body capacity. International Political Science Review, 40(3), 335 – 353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119832924

Grainger, S., Ochoa-Tocachi, B. F., Antiporta, J., Dewulf, A., & Buytaert, W. (2020). Tailoring infographics on water resources through iterative, user-centered design: A case study in the Peruvian Andes. Water Resources Research, 56(2), e2019WR026694.

Grönlund, K., & Milner, H. (2006). The determinants of political knowledge in comparative perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(4), 386 – 406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00157.x

Haniifah, C., & Melissa, E. (2025). Social Media for Political Education: How X Account @BijakMemilih Engages Generation Z in Politics. 2025 16th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning, IC4e 2025, 328 – 332. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC4e65071.2025.11075499

He, C., Liu, H., He, L., Lu, T., & Li, B. (2022). More collaboration, less seriousness: Investigating new strategies for promoting youth engagement in government-generated videos during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107019

Jensen, M. J., & Anstead, N. (2014). Campaigns and Social Media Communications: A Look at Digital Campaigning in the 2010 U.K. General Election. Studies in Public Choice, 31, 57 – 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_5

Jude, A. V., & P, P. (2025). Social media activism: Delving into Generation Z’s experiences. Communication Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2025.2554375

Kayyali, M. (2025). Strategies for Engaging Generation Z Students in Higher Education. In Developing Student Engagement Opportunities in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0644-5.ch007

Kerr, D., & Hoskins, B. (2023). The evidence on educational methods for political engagement. In Who’s Afraid of Political Education?: The Challenge to Teach Civic Competence and Democratic Participation. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2711500.14

Langford, M., Schiel, R., & Wilson, B. M. (2021). The Rise of Electoral Management Bodies: Diffusion and Effects. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 16(1), S60 – S84. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.29

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1989). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. The Review of Higher Education, 12(3), 221–240.

Macnamara, J., & Kenning, G. (2014). E-Electioneering 2007-13: Trends in online political campaigns over three elections. Media International Australia, 152, 57 – 74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x1415200107

Mani, L., Sasmoko, Sungkharisma, B., Arabella, C., & Azzahra, C. G. (2025). Live Streaming, Personal Branding and Political Communication: Gen Z’s Active Participation in the 2024 Indonesian presidential election. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025186

Mietzner, M. (2022). Sources of resistance to democratic decline: Indonesian civil society and its trials. In Democratic Regressions in Asia (pp. 161–178). Routledge.

Naasz, C., Wyosnick, I., Boyd, S., & Berman, M. (2016). Involving the Public in the Design of the Ticket Vending Machine User Interface.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Origins of terms. On the Horizon, 9(5).

Sakashita, M. (2020). Generation Z in Japan: Raised in Anxiety. In The New Generation Z in Asia: Dynamics, Differences, Digitalization. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-220-820201007

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. John Wiley & Sons.

Taneerat, W., & Dongnadeng, H. A. (2024). Digital Political Trends and Behaviors among Generation Z in Thailand. Southeast Asian Studies, 13(3), 521 – 545. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.13.3_521

Velasco, J. C., Manguera, J. J. C., Navalan, E. J. V, Limchiko, J. N. C., Bayot, T. A. M. D., & Mercado, M. G. V. (2024). The Digital Dynamics of Political Engagement Among Filipino Youth: Examining Participation in Social Media Platforms. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 32(3), 1051 – 1071. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.3.12

Venus, A., Intyaswati, D., Ayuningtyas, F., & Lestari, P. (2025). Political participation in the digital age: Impact of influencers and advertising on Generation Z. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2520063

Volodenkov, S. V. (2019). Influence of internet communication technologies on contemporary social and political processes: Scenarios, challenges, and actors. Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i Sotsial’nye Peremeny, 153(5), 341 – 364. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.5.16

Waldvogel, T., Oberle, M., & Leunig, J. (2023). What Do Pupils Learn from Voting Advice Applications in Civic Education Classes? Effects of a Digital Intervention Using Voting Advice Applications on Students’ Political Dispositions. Social Sciences, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12110621

Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041

Xenos, M. A., Macafee, T., & Pole, A. (2017). Understanding variations in user response to social media campaigns: A study of Facebook posts in the 2010 US elections. New Media and Society, 19(6), 826 – 842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616617




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30984/pp.v29i1.3302

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 213 times
PDF - 50 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Potret Pemikiran

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statistic Journal Potret

Rumah Jurnal Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado

Jl. Dr. S.H. Sarundajang, Kawasan Ringroad I, Malendeng Manado Kode Pos 95128, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia.

Creative Commons License

All publication by  Potret Pemikiran are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Potret Pemikiran, ISSN 1693-1874 (Print), ISSN 2528-0376 (Online)